By Shaun Tandon/AFP
![]() |
Photo
taken in 1976 shows Jamaican reggae star Bob Marley/AFP
|
A
US court has sided with Bob Marley's family, which sued a company that sold
shirts depicting the reggae legend, in a case with potential ramifications for
merchandise of other deceased stars.
The
estate of the Jamaican icon had filed a suit after low-cost T-shirts --
featuring a photo of a speaking Marley next to the yellow, green and red colors
associated with his Rastafarian faith -- went on sale at Walmart, Target and
other major US retailers.
A
jury in the western state of Nevada in 2011 awarded more than $2 million in
damages and legal fees to firms owned by Marley's children that said they had
lost an order to sell T-shirts at Walmart as the unauthorized rival was
distributing a similar product.
The
defendants lodged an appeal that was rejected Friday by a federal court, which
agreed that the non-family companies violated the 1946 Lanham Act, a key US law
on copyright infringement.
The
court, which heard a survey of 509 customers at a shopping mall, agreed that
the T-shirts could create an impression that Marley had endorsed them.
"This
case presents a question that is familiar in our circuit: when does the use of
a celebrity's likeness or persona in connection with a product constitute false
endorsement that is actionable under the Lanham Act?" asked Judge N. Randy
Smith of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which is based in San
Francisco with jurisdiction across the West Coast.
"We
conclude that the evidence presented at trial was sufficient for a jury to find
defendants violated the Lanham Act by using Marley's likeness."
The
accused company, A.V.E.L.A., had said that recognizing such an argument for a
dead person would essentially create a federal right of publicity -- how a
person can be used for commercial purposes.
Individual
US states have established a right to publicity but, despite longstanding
debate, there is no law at a federal level.
-
Enduring icon -
Marley,
who would have turned 70 this month, died in 1981 but his music and advocacy of
social justice still carry wide appeal.
"Even
now -- more than 30 years after his death -- Marley's influence continues to
resonate, and his iconic image to command millions of dollars each year in
merchandising revenue," the court ruling said.
The
finding is consistent with a ruling last month by a London court that agreed
with pop singer Rihanna, who accused major British retailer Topshop of selling
a T-shirt bearing her image without her permission.
Marley
presents a different legal dilemma, as he is dead.
He
is hardly the only deceased celebrity whose image remains widely marketed, with
Kurt Cobain, Jimi Hendrix and Jim Morrison among late stars whose T-shirts are
still hot-sellers.
In
2002, the Ninth Circuit court ruled against the estate of Princess Diana, which
had sued The Franklin Mint company for producing jewelry and other merchandise
with the late royal's image.
In
the latest ruling, the federal court drew a distinction, saying that Diana,
unlike Marley, had done little to prevent commercial use of her image when she
was alive.
The
court heard testimony by Roberto Rabanne, a photographer whose picture of
Marley was the basis for the T-shirt.
He
said that the chief executive of A.V.E.L.A. pressed him to write an email that
falsely said that Rabanne used pictures of Marley on merchandise when the
musician was alive.
No comments:
Post a Comment