By Okey Ndibe
Last week, representatives of
Nigeria’s political parties and its electoral commission met in Abuja. At the
end of a marathon meeting, Attahiru Jega of the Independent National Electoral
Commission (INEC) announced that the country’s general elections would be
postponed by six weeks.
Trust Nigerians: reactions to the
development fell along partisan lines. It had been clear for some time that
President Goodluck Jonathan and his inner circle were desperate to reschedule
the election, the reason being the failure of the incumbent president’s
campaign to gain traction.
On the other hand, partisans of the
opposition All Progressives Congress (APC) abominated the decision. For them,
the decision represented a stealing of their party’s and presidential
candidate’s momentum, a form of electoral heist, a veritable effort to subvert
the will of their Nigerian electorate.
Other Nigerians opted to occupy the
middle of a riven, contentious divide. Seeking to project themselves as
realists, these “centrists” argued that there was simply no way the elections
could have gone on the erstwhile timetable. Hundreds of thousands of voters had
not received their permanent voters cards.
Hundreds of thousands of voters in
Nigeria’s terror-plagued northeast are displaced from their homes, living in
shambolic refugee quarters within Nigeria and even in neighboring countries.
Large swathes of territory in that zone of Nigeria are under the occupation of
Boko Haram, or susceptible to capture by the group’s well-armed fighters. How
hold elections as scheduled when those Nigerians caught under the “Caliphate”
of Islamist insurgents are certain to be disenfranchised?
Whether one sees the postponement as
justified or not, the implications of the development are far more troubling
than the warring partisans on either side—and the ostensible realists—appear to
realize or willing to admit. I’d suggest that the decision was, above all, a
moment of national undressing.
As the world looked on, Nigeria’s political
class removed the mask their country has worn for so long. They exposed their
and their country’s sordid underbelly. To borrow the fresh phrase of an uneducated,
rustic Nigerian politician, “Everything has nakeded itself.”
There’s nothing more exasperating than
to listen to Nigerians, especially public officials or their hirelings, who
insist that our country is a coherent entity. These official apologists are quick
to euphemize Nigeria’s myriad crises as mere teething problems. Yes, they have
since retreated from the days of proclaiming their country the “giant of
Africa,” but these custodians of an inflated national narrative are yet to come
to terms with the reality that—to paraphrase Wole Soyinka—there’s no nation in
the space called Nigeria.
A few days ago, a friend told me that
the Nigerian elections needed to be postponed in order to avert the fulfillment
of the prediction by some US intelligence experts that Nigeria could fracture
by 2015. My response: the postponement of the elections is confirmation that
Nigeria has already fallen to pieces. We who think there is an extant cohesive
Nigeria are mere stubborn believers in a will-o-the wisp.
There’s no way to dissect the
postponement to make it look good. If it’s the case that President Jonathan
used his powers of incumbency to force the shifting of the date for elections,
then we’re looking at a dire situation. In a settled—that is to say,
ideologically and structurally sound—political community, no one man, however
high his office, would be able to blackmail his way to a self-serving
postponement of elections. In fact, if Nigeria were a nation, no one person or
party would dare demand that elections be postponed to serve their selfish,
partisan ends. Even the mere entertainment of the thought would spell doom for
the person or political party.
Clearly, INEC was ill prepared for the
elections. How else explain the commission’s failure to put voters cards in the
hands of hundreds of thousands of eligible voters? This kind of deliberate
ineptitude bespeaks the wretchedness of Nigeria as an idea and entity. It’s not
as if INEC officials woke up two weeks ago and were told, surprise, surprise,
to start planning elections.
They knew as far back as four years ago—the last
time Nigeria held general elections—that this election cycle would arrive. So
why did the commission fail to do even the basic things? If Nigeria were a
society where patriotic pride is part of the national tradition, where
citizenship means something vital, Mr. Jega and his management would have
tendered their letters of resignation en masse—and exited the INEC building in
bowed, shamed heads. Their incompetence would have provoked outrage all around.
The displaced, disenfranchised voters
of the northeast of Nigeria present a conundrum. Yet, to exploit their state to
justify the postponement of elections is to enter into uncertain, dangerous
territory. If these roaming refugees must be resettled in their homes before
elections are to hold, then we might as well perpetually put off the elections.
Nobody in Nigeria knows when our military would be able rise to the challenge
of reclaiming the territories seized by Boko Haram. For that matter, nobody knows
if that’s ever going to happen.
Let me suggest that Nigeria’s
postponement of elections is not a new watermark of incompetence and failure.
It is only our display to the world of the depths of our shamelessness, our
mediocrity, and our lack of seriousness. Despite our politicians’ rhetoric,
Nigeria is rotten through and through. And now we are exhibiting our grotesque
sore to the rest of the world.
If anybody was in doubt that Nigeria is
a contraption maintained to serve the greed of a few, I hope the sordid drama
of elections has dispelled it. In the last two weeks, we have witnessed the
ratcheting up of violent, partisan rhetoric on several sides. It’s all about
which self-selected camp of Nigeria’s misruling class will preside over the
looting of the country’s fast disappearing assets. They will sacrifice the
lives of innocent Nigerians to serve their greed.
If elections can be easily postponed,
why don’t Nigerians propose something even more radical? Why must we continue
to support a Presidency whose annual feeding budget exceeds what’s spent on the
education of students in several universities put together? Why must we keep
paying each of our national legislators millions of dollars each year just so
they can tell ministerial nominees to “bow and go”?
Let’s demand the dismantling of this
awful edifice that’s been misnamed “democracy.” No, I am NOT calling for
military rule—I am deeply opposed to that idea. Instead, for a period of at
least two years, let’s put Nigeria in the hands of a caretaker group of
technocrats nominated by students, workers, peasants, and professional groups.
The caretaker group major task should be the refashioning of Nigeria. That
would entail addressing broad issues (of citizenship and national ethos) as
well as practical ones. There’s no justification for Nigeria to have full-time
legislators. There’s no reason to have the most expansive immunity clause in
the world. There’s no logic to handing millions of dollars each month to
governors or the president in the name of security vote.
Please follow me on twitter @ okeyndibe
No comments:
Post a Comment