By Karen
Mohan
Freedom of
information (FOI) is considered a fundamental component of freedom of
expression. When citizens are ill-informed and unable to access basic public
information, it is impossible for them to fully realise their right to freedom
of expression.
As Steven
Adler of the data and information governance website, InfoGov Community, describes it: “To be
ill-informed and speak freely is a form of intellectual slavery.”
FOI is also
central to the realisation of a number of other rights. Where FOI is absent in
a national legislative framework, citizens cannot effectively access
information about basic services, fully participate in the social and economic
development of their countries or hold their governments accountable for public
spending, which can in turn adversely affect their rights to health, employment
and education, and to fight corruption.
Poor access
to information disproportionally affects women, children and the poor and
marginalised, who are often adversely affected by a lack of vital information
with respect to their legal, political and economic rights. It further
negatively affects economic growth and development, where inadequate mechanisms
for sharing information are often attributed to slow progress.
What is ‘freedom of information’?
FOI is
generally defined as the right to seek, access and receive information from
public bodies.
However,
laws across Africa differ in their definition of this right. In some states,
such as South Africa, the right empowers the public to access information from
private bodies that perform a public function or are funded by the public. The
inclusion of private bodies within FOI law constitutes a recognition that
public functions carried out by private bodies, such as the provision of
electricity or water, are connected to the functions of government and are
directly paid for by taxpayers.
A number of
other countries, including Nigeria, Zimbabwe, Uganda and Ethiopia, do not
extend their application of the law to the same extent.
Freedom of information in Africa: on paper
FOI
legislation is not new: Sweden and Finland enacted such laws
as early as 1766. But the past two decades have seen a surge in the
number of countries adopting FOI laws, indicating recognition that transparency
is a necessary condition of democracy. Almost half of the world’s countries –
98 at present – have enacted FOI laws that provide their citizens with a legal
right to access information.
However, the
uptake of this trend has been slower on the African continent. In fact, it is
only in the past three years that any substantial increase in legislative
reforms have been noted. Prior to 2011, the number of countries with FOI
legislation on the continent stood at five, representing just 9% of the
continent; this number has increased to 13, representing 24% of all countries
in Africa. Currently, South Africa, Angola, Zimbabwe, Uganda, Sierra Leone,
Côte D’Ivoire, Nigeria, Niger, Ethiopia, Rwanda, Tunisia, Guinea and Liberia
have all adopted FOI laws.
A number of
regional developments and successful advocacy campaigns have also encouraged
the view that the tide is changing for the continent with respect to FOI.
Significant developments include:
- The adoption of the African Platform on Access to Information Declaration of 2011, which contains a list of key principles essential to the full realisation of the right of access to information.
- The passing of Resolution 222 by the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights in 2012. This resolution authorised the Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information in Africa to include access to information in the Declaration of Principles on Freedom of Expression. It further recommended that the African Union officially recognise September 28 as International Right to Information Day in Africa.
- The adoption of the Model Law on Access to Information for Africa in 2013, prepared by the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights.
- The adoption of the Midrand Declaration on Press Freedom in Africa by the Pan-African Parliament in 2013, which calls on African Union member states to adopt and review access to information laws.
In addition
to these regional instruments, FOI is a human right guaranteed by Article 19 of
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
and Article 19 (2) of the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights, Article 9 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, and
Article 4 of the Declaration of Principles on Freedom
of Expression in Africa.
On July 21
2011 the United Nations Human Rights Committee adopted General Comment 34 on the International Covenant
on Civil and Political Rights, which detailed its interpretation of
governments’ obligations to protect freedom of opinion and expression, as
guaranteed by Article 19, and reaffirmed access to information as a human
right.
Freedom of information in Africa: the reality
Despite the
significant increase in the number of countries recognising the right to access
information on the continent, a large portion of African states still seem
unable or unwilling to adopt access to information laws.
A number of
governments refuse to provide citizens with even the most basic information,
seemingly due to a combination of impunity and lack of political will, or a
lack of systems enabling the state to promptly provide the requested
information.
The annual
Media Institute of Southern Africa study on the “Most Open and Secretive
Government In Southern Africa” examines transparency of southern African
authorities. The most recent report
indicated that governments were violating citizens’ rights to access
information across the region.
In general, government websites did not have the
relevant information available; most websites also lacked financial or
budgetary information. Responses to written requests were poor, with
institutions often not responding at all, or questioning why the applicant
sought the information in the first place.
The
underlying causes of such violations, according to the study, included either a
lack of laws guaranteeing access to information, or a lack of implementation
where such laws were in place.
Some countries
have drafted FOI bills but have not taken the process any further, despite
indicating a clear intention to do so. In Zambia, for example, the government
has sat on its FOI bill and not presented the document to parliament despite
pre-2011 election promises to do so. In others, FOI laws have yet to be signed
into law. In South Sudan, for example, a FOI law was adopted by parliament in
July 2013, but is still awaiting the president’s signature.
In some
states it is questionable whether there have been any efforts to implement such
laws at all. This not only applies to recently adopted laws, but laws that have
been in existence for a number of years. Angola, for example, has not yet
implemented the FOI law it adopted in 2002.
A September
2013 regional capacity workshop, convened by Reseau des Journalistes
Economiques de Guinee with the intention of promoting FOI in Francophone
countries in Africa reported: “Despite increased adoption of FOI laws in
Africa, effective implementation of such laws remains a challenge in many parts
of the continent.”
Other laws contributing to freedom of information
A 2013 study carried out by
the African Platform on Access to Information examined the state of access to
information in 14 countries in southern, eastern and western Africa. It found
that, in addition to existing legislation, 65% of the countries surveyed had
more specific sectoral laws that supported the right of access to information.
The study
found that in countries where no specific FOI right existed – including
Senegal, Tanzania, Zambia, Kenya and the Democratic Republic of Congo –
sectoral laws often provided an alternative mechanism by which citizens could
access information. In the Democratic Republic of Congo, for example, laws such
as the mining code had been used to ensure greater access to, and disclosure of
information.
Mining communities have used the act to seek information on mining
revenues and the amounts they are entitled to, as well as how licences are
allocated. Other examples of such laws include whistleblower protection, data
protection, public procurement, fiscal responsibility and extractive industry
transparency initiative acts.
In addition,
a number of countries constitutionally protect FOI rights. Zimbabwe was the
most recent country to recognise the right in its 2013 constitution. Despite
this, however, only a handful of countries have used existing constitutional
protections to secure FOI rights.
In Kenya, for example, the Electoral
and Boundaries Commission was compelled to release information with respect to
disputed election results in 2013, when petitioners sought the information by
using their constitutional right to access information. This is probably due to
low public awareness of the existence of such laws, in addition to a lack of
clarity on the applicability of constitutional protections in the absence of a
specific FOI laws.
Why is FOI important?
The absence
of FOI legislation can lead to the violation of citizens’ fundamental rights.
In the absence of transparency, it is impossible for countries to operate as
democracies. In a democracy it is essential that people can access a wide range
of information in order to participate in a meaningful way in matters that
affect them. It entrenches the principle that public “servants” act on behalf
of the public when carrying out their functions and must remain accountable for
their actions.
FOI is also
essential to combat corruption on the continent. According to FOI organisation Action Namibia, the African Union Commission
Department of Political Affairs has stated that “corruption continues to deepen
poverty in Africa, and could be a major factor in Africa’s (especially
sub-Saharan Africa’s) inability in meeting the Millennium Development Goals
(MDGs) by the target year of 2015.”
FOI has a
significant impact on how citizens live their daily lives, and contributes
significantly to access education, employment and health, as well as access to
basic amenities and services, such as water, housing and electricity through
ensuring citizens can hold government to account.
The
Promotion of Access to Information Act (PAIA) in South Africa, for example, has
been used to ensure better service delivery, in turn promoting the
socioeconomic rights of citizens. In “How the Right to Information makes a
Difference”, a chapter in the 2011 MISA Media in Africa
report, the Open Democracy Advice Centre’s Mukelani Dimba points to the example
of women living in one of the most impoverished areas of KwaZulu-Natal,
Ntambanana. Using PAIA, the women unearthed local council meeting minutes, as
well as a budget, which indicated that plans existed to provide water to the
community.
Karen Mohan
is a specialist in media law policy and advocacy at the Media Institute of
Southern Africa.
Useful web
resources
ACTION
Namibia – The ACTION Namibia coalition was formed in July 2012 when
a number of like-minded organisations decided to focus their resources (human
and financial) to put Access to Information back on the policy agenda of the
Namibian Government as part of its commitment to eradicate corruption.
Africa
Freedom of Information Centre – is a pan-African NGO and resource
centre that promotes the right of access to information through comparative
research, coordinating regional advocacy, facilitating information-sharing and
capacity building.
African
Platform on Access to Information – The African Platform on Access
to Information (APAI) is a network of civil society organisations that are
working on the promotion of access to information in Africa.
Article19
– is a London-based NGO that monitors, lobbies and litigates on behalf of
freedom of expression. It also campaigns for the right to access information
held by governments, public authorities and private bodies and companies.
Freedominfo.org
– freedominfo.org is a one-stop portal that describes best practices,
consolidates lessons learned, explains campaign strategies and tactics, and
links the efforts of freedom of information advocates around the world. It
contains crucial information on freedom of information laws and how they were
drafted and implemented, including how various provisions have worked in
practice.
Institute
for Public Policy Research – The Institute for Public Policy
Research (IPPR) is a not-for-profit organisation with a mission to deliver
independent, analytical, critical yet constructive research into social,
political and economic issues that affect development in Namibia. The IPPR was
established in the belief that free and critical debate informed by quality
research promotes development.
Media
Institute of Southern Africa – The Media Institute for Southern
Africa (MISA) is a regional membership–based non–government organization
working for free, independent,pluralistic, sustainable media environment.
MISA’s membership is based in 11 of the Southern Africa Development
Community (SADC) countries.Officially launched in September 1992, MISA focuses
primarily on the need to promote free, independent and pluralistic media, as
envisaged in the1991 Windhoek Declaration.
Media Rights
Agenda – Media Rights Agenda promotes and defends freedom of expression, press
freedom and the right of access to information.
Media
Foundation for West Africa – The Media Foundation for West Africa
(MFWA) is a regional independent, non-profit, non-governmental organisation
based in Accra, Ghana. It was established in 1997 to defend and promote the
rights and freedoms of the media, and generally, to help expand the boundaries
of freedom of speech and expression in West Africa.
Open Democracy Advice Centre – ODAC’s promotes open and
transparent democracy; foster a culture of corporate and government
accountability; and assist people in South Africa to be able to realize their
human rights.
© Copyright
Africa Check 2014. You may reproduce this report or content from it for the
purpose of reporting and/or discussing news and current events, subject to
providing a credit to "Africa Check a non-partisan organisation which
promotes accuracy in public debate and the media. Twitter @AfricaCheck and www.africacheck.org".
We hold public figures accountable
For democracy
to function, public figures need to be held to account for what they say. The
claims they make need to be checked, openly and impartially. Africa Check is an
independent, non-partisan organisation which assesses claims made in the public
arena using journalistic skills and evidence drawn from the latest online
tools, readers, public sources and experts, sorting fact from fiction and
publishing the results.
- See more
at: http://africacheck.org/factsheets/factsheet-freedom-of-information-laws-on-the-african-continent/#sthash.o9ZzFCHF.dpuf

No comments:
Post a Comment