By
James Breiner
A master's degree in English literature
might not seem an ideal preparation for a career as a business journalist.
Actually it served me well, for all the reasons given by advocates of a liberal arts education.
But my own experience seems to have
little to do with what the journalism job market is seeking today. Should we be
improving students' minds and souls or helping them get a job?
These days I advise students to be
practical. Employers and recent graduates are telling me that the current job
market demands that job applicants know:
- Multimedia storytelling skills. Producing slideshows with sound, shooting and editing video and photos, writing for the web.
- Data and statistical skills for storytelling. Collecting, editing, analyzing and interpreting data to produce compelling interactive maps and graphics.
- Audience development skills (formerly known as marketing and circulation) such as managing online communities, interpreting data on audience behavior, crowdsourcing for information, interacting with the audience.
- Basics of programming. How to create compelling pages that attract web audiences.
- The business of media. Journalists can help a news organization generate revenues without compromising their ethics, and today that skill is more important than ever.
Surely there could be more, but then
the universities and professors have to ask themselves, if we add all these
things, what are we going to leave out? We already have a packed course
curriculum, how could we possibly add more?
That is the wrong question to ask,
because today, the market for which universities are preparing students is
demanding a different type of graduate. The market is putting less importance
on the degree a person has and more on the skills.
"Digital first" in education
Cindy Royal, professor at Texas State
University, is advocating that journalism schools "flip the curriculum" to
emphasize "digital first." In other words, "what I am
proposing is a curriculum in which digital is the foundation, and the basic
skills of writing, reporting and editing are injected into digitally focused
courses, as opposed to inserting a digital lesson or two into traditional
classes."
The job market seems to agree. A young
acquaintance of mine was applying for an online reporting job at an
internationally renowned news organization, and the interviewer wanted to know
more about the metrics of audience engagement with his stories -- time spent,
social sharing, search traffic -- than the stories themselves. In other words,
did this job candidate understand how to capture and interact with the audience
on the web?
Of course, the editor had already read
the candidate's stories. Of course, the quality of the writing and reporting
was important. The point is that the market expects graduates to bring them a
new set of skills.
The question for educators should be,
where could he learn those marketable skills? Would it be at a university?
Metrics aren't the enemy
No lectures, please, on whether we are
in danger of pandering to the audience with metrics. You can use metrics to
determine if your editorial niche is resonating with the audience without
abandoning your standards.
You don't have to pander to the
audience to reap commercial value. Even an investigative story that does not
produce much traffic can help the business, as Felix Salmon noted in a recent blog post.
Advertisers will see that a site is a serious news outlet "and be that
much more willing to pay premium rates to advertise on the site as a result.
Readers who like having fast news during the day like having meatier stuff to
read over the weekend."
Investigative stories strengthen the
value of the brand, attract the best journalistic talent and encourage sources
to come out of the woodwork, Salmon adds.
Commercial and editorial values do not
have to conflict. Serious advertisers don't necessarily want a huge quantity of
views. They want their message to appear in the appropriate context: a business
environment, say, rather than a football match or shopping mall. So today's
journalists need to know how to interpret the top line metrics, such as page
views and unique users, and not be misled by big numbers.
Does your journalism faculty understand this topic?
New job descriptions
We can waste a lot of time lamenting
the layoffs at media outlets, or we can help students prepare for the new types
of jobs that did not exist a decade ago.
If you look at the recruitment ads or
the staff listings at leading digital media, you will see job titles such as
"user engagement strategist," "editor of outreach and social
media," "audience development manager," and the like. They
didn't exist a few years ago.
In the halcyon days of media
monopolies, journalists knew little and often cared less about what the
audience thought of their work. Today journalists have to know how to be
interactive, and some universities have responded to the demand. One example is
USC's Annenberg School, which offers a master's in managing online communities. There
are others.
Intersection of technology and
communication
The future of journalism is digital,
and that means it depends on technology. New jobs are opening up for people who
can bridge the two worlds. Some job descriptions today at media organizations
are "newsroom technology expert," "manager of search optimization,"
"mobile platform development specialist," and "data
journalist."
Digital media allow data journalists to
display their work in compelling interactive graphics and maps. But
they can't just produce pretty pictures. They have to know how to verify and
clean up the data and present it in a way that tells a story. This is another
opportunity.
Some innovative university programs are
cultivating relationships with computer science engineers and programmers to
develop tools for journalists. The new technologies have potential to improve
the collection, analysis, display and distribution of news and information.
Universities innovate
Amy Schmitz Weiss of San Diego State mentioned some academic innovators
recently in Nieman Lab and commented, "Data is all around us,
and it will only become more pervasive as digital technologies advance and our
daily lives become centered on these two worlds. As educators, are we preparing
our students to be able to manage these two worlds of data science and digital
media together effectively and accurately?"
The two worlds can come together in
many ways.
Mindy McAdams of the University of
Florida has long been teaching students how to write code and how it will improve the
quality and reach of their journalism.
The Hacks/Hackers movement that
links journalists with technologists started with a collaboration between Rich
Gordon of Northwestern University, Aron Pilhofer of the New York Times and Burt
Herman, a former AP foreign correspondent and Knight Fellow at Stanford
University. It has spawned chapters around the world.
Journalism.co.uk has described how
working journalists can improve their data skills through a series of self-help tactics.
Journalism and the liberal arts
After laying out what I think the next
generation of journalists needs to know, I find the list daunting. It's too
much. I ask myself, how can a university possibly prepare them for everything
they need to know?
The answer, I think, is that they
can't. What they can prepare them for is a mix of the practical and what I think
is more important, the critical thinking and communication (writing, speaking)
skills.
No university can teach a student
everything they need to know in their future career. That's what life does.
My own study of literature indirectly
helped me in my career when I needed to learn how to produce journalism at a
daily newspaper and, later, how to write about business and the economy.
Studying the textual sources of
Shakespeare's plays is an exercise in analyzing the reliability of sources.
Historical geology helps put human evolution and climate change into context.
French literature of the18th Century shows the origins of our ideas about
liberty and equality, useful for interpreting the Arab Spring.
It feels like a cop-out to say that the
right answer to the question of what to teach journalism students is to find a
balance between the practical and the edifying. Easier said than done.
This post originally appeared on the
blog News Entrepreneurs. It is
published on IJNet with the author's permission.
James Breiner is a consultant in online
journalism and leadership. He is a former co-director of the Global Business Journalism Program at
Tsinghua University and a former Knight International Journalism Fellow
who launched and directed the Center for Digital Journalism at the University of
Guadalajara. He is bilingual in Spanish and English. You can follow
him on Twitter here.
No comments:
Post a Comment