By Alfred Ilenre
![]() |
|
Anthony Enahoro
|
The
late elder statesman, Chief Anthony Enahoro was born on July 22, 1923. Until
his death on December 15, 2010, he was the chairman of the Movement for
National Reformation (MNR).
By
2004, he joined other Nigerians to form the Pro-National Conference
Organisation (PRONACO) which organised a process led Peoples National
Conference (PNC) from 2005 to 2007, where he served as the Chairman. A draft
constitution proposed by the conference was released on August 5, 2007 and has
since been in circulation. If Chief Enahoro were to be alive today, he would be
celebrating his 90th birthday anniversary.
The
late elder statesman’s name appeared as a great motivator in the nationalist
struggle very early in life. As a student activist, Chief Enahoro led a student
revolt at the King’s College, Lagos, against the school authority and the
colonial administration in 1943.
Confidential
report about him as recorded by the colonists said, the young activist whose both parents were school teachers
started to over read his school teachers in form three, at the Kings College.
This drew the colonists’ special attention on him.
On
leaving the Kings College, he joined the Zikist Group of Newspapers as a
journalist. He became editor of the Daily Comet, one of the titles in the
Zikist Group of newspapers in 1944, at the age of 21.
As
a young radical journalist, Chief Enahoro was an outspoken critic of the
colonial occupation of Nigeria he saw them as alien interlopers and unwanted
meddlers in Africa affairs.
His
writings exposed him to the colonial administration which sent him to jail
three times in 1946 at the age of 23, 1947 and 1949.
A
lot has been said about the historical fact that Chief Enahoro was the mover of
the crisis motion for Nigerian independence in 1953, at the age of 30.
Three
years after independence in 1963 at the age of 40 the post independence
government of Alhaji Abubakar Tafawa Balewa sentenced him to 15 years
imprisonment.
He
was released from jail during the national political crisis of 1966, and was
the Chief negotiator during the Nigeria -Biafra war from 1967-1970. He served
under the military administration of General Yakubu Gowon as the Minister for
Information and Labour.
By
1990, when it became apparent that the military administration of General
Babangida was becoming rudderless, heading to nowhere. Chief Enahoro teamed up
with other Nigerian patriots and civil society activists, calling for a return
to civil rule.
He
was a co-chairman of the National Democratic Coalition (NADECO). He left for
exile in the United States of America (USA), during the dictatorship regime of
the late General Sanni Abacha who wanted him live or dead.
His
associates have made arrangement for series of activities to mark his 90th
posthumous birthday anniversary for the remaining part of the year including a
symposium, talk shops, media events and a visit to his tomb in Uromi, his birth
place in Edo State.
During
his last few years on earth, Chief Enahoro was in possession of the United
Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNIDRIP) and became
extremely loud and insisted in telling Nigerians that he and his colleagues in
the nationalist movement bargained for a loose federal structure for Nigeria
and not a unitary system, now in place,
imposed by the military.
It
was on the basis of this that he and others at the age of 82, in 2005, convened
the Pro-National Conference Organisation (PRONACO), which produced a draft
constitution for the country, titled PRONACO draft constitution.
The
nationalist were aware that the British colonialists created one country called
Nigeria out of many nations, who had always been jealous of their individual ethnic
and cultural identities.
His
views against the distortion of the original plan for a federal Nigeria by the
military were strongly expressed in one of his two last public statements
before his death, at the burial ceremony of the late mother of Chief Ralph
Uwazurike, leader of the Movement for the Actualisation of the Sovereign State
of Biafra (MASSOB) at Okwe, Imo state in January 2008 and at the Obafemi
Awolowo University on July 22, 2009 respectively.
Following
are extracts from the speech
‘‘TOWARDS
A NEW NIGERIA’’,
We
have just listened to a moving prayer which will touch many hearts because of
its reverence and the reference to a lady who will pass into history because
she was the mother of a maker of history.
Ladies
and Gentlemen, there is a notable awakening these days among the various people
of Nigeria, mainly because the last few years stand out as years of ethnic
nationality consciousness, especially among our youths, particularly the youths
of Igbo land, one of whom is the principal mourner of today.
“When
the news of the activities of the Movement for the Actualisation of Sovereign
State of Biafra (MASSOB) first hit the waves very many months ago, I asked
myself whether somebody was merely trying to remind us of his experiences
during the Biafra War or whether we were doomed once again to go through that
sad episode.
Before
the outbreak of “PRONACO people’s National Conference” many years later, I had
extensive consultations with some quite prominent and other less prominent
citizens across the country. They included members of Odua People’s Congress,
Niger Delta Volunteer Front, MASSOB, Arewa Youth Consultative Forum and many
other groups.
It struck me that the leader of MASSOB, Chief Ralph Uwazurike,
was not merely posturing or reeling out grievance against the authorities, but
that was self-confident and a man with good foresight.
Whether
or not one shared his radical views, one could not fail to appreciate that he
was truthful about his service to his people.
He
was conscious of some of the mistakes that some of the rulers of Nigeria had
made since our independence, especially mistakes which shut their eyes against
the differences among the distinct ethnic nationalities in the country.
Some
leaders in the country advocated unity only because of their fear that Nigeria
might disintegrate if our differences were deeply examined and objectively
discussed, which some of us saw as cowardice because we believed that people
should not forget their pedigrees or their political, historical, cultural,
linguistic, environmental or territorial differences, because the causes of
difference are always there and cannot be shunned.
Many
of us believed that we must learn to build the foundation of the unity of our
country and of its component parts on the understanding that differences are
not necessarily impairment to unity and that unity only makes sense because of
the presence of differences. In other words, we can be different but yet be
friends and united.
I
asked Chief Uwazurike during our meeting: “If the PRONACO PHC document emerges
as acceptable to your group, will you accept the New Nigeria arising from its”
His answer was a categorical Yes”, which was not the language of a totally
unreasonable person as he is being painted by his opponents.
A
few days later, Chief Uwazurike was surprisingly arrested and plunged into a
timeless detention on a charge of treason. As at now, he is temporarily let out
of the prison yard on the mercy of a trial judge who allowed him time to give a
befitting burial, he is expected to return to the prison yard. What a curious
manner of justice is this.
All
the ethnic groups in Nigeria had their administrative structures long before
colonial rule was imposed on us. We cannot expect them all to cling uncomplainingly
to a Unitarian system that may well mean very little to them and then mortgage
their future, the future of their children and even the future of their
children’s children.
The
PRONACO people’s National Conference draft constitution provides answer to
Nigeria’s structural defeats that permit the miscarriages of justice of all
sorts.
I
feel honoured that in spite of the condition in which Chief Uwazurike was
detained, MASSOB was able to make its views known to PRONACO, and I am equally
proud of Nigerian womanhood that his wife Mrs. Uwazurike was able to join the
plaintiff in the place of her husband in the court case challenging the 1999
constitution.
Ladies
and Gentlemen, one of the main objectives of the PRONACO PHC draft constitution
is to establish a Nigerian democratic structure that will save Nigeria’s ethnic
nationalities and indigenous tribal and cultural groups from the shackles of
internal colonization.
We
must always remember that Nigeria was not created for the benefit and
advantages of the nationalities that today dominate Nigeria, but that Nigeria
was created by the British for the benefit and advantages of the part of Europe
that created Nigeria, and it took the courage of Nigerian youths to liberate
Nigeria.
The
peaceful war that we are waging today, the battles that Chief Uwazurike and
others have fought and the struggles that I and my colleagues fought in the
years past, created a democratic challenge, namely a political struggle for
justice.
The
goals of the Nigerian people have been outlined with emphasis focused on the
political, economic and cultural autonomy for the federating ethnic nations.
It
was a loftily noticeable that throughout the PRONACO deliberations, no ethnic
group opted for the disintegration of Nigeria.
The
decision to remain in Nigeria, whether by Uwazurike’s followers or by our other
PRONACOISTS, was not because they or we thought that becoming a fully
independent country on their or our own is wrong, nor merely
because the old constitution provides that secession is treason, but because we
all believed that Nigeria can be made to work for the benefit of its entire
people and for the benefit of the rest of humanity.
The
alternative to what we and Uwazurikeists believe and advocate would be
dictatorship which would lead to the eventual collapse of Nigeria. Those who
cling on to the present system where education, health, housing systems and
road networks have failed are basically weak and many are dishonest.
We
of PRONACO have followed and analysed brother Uwazurike’s activities. Our
judgment is that he is not a nation wrecker who should be put away in prison
cell, but a citizen with whom the Nigerian government should be ready to have a
serious dialogue.
Only
cowards and corrupts leaders are usually afraid of discussion with opponents.
We of the present generation and the Nigeria of tomorrow must avoid the
mistakes of the past.
It
may interest many of you here today to know that since the end of the Biafra
War, the United Nation has initiated some instruments governing struggles for
self-determination.
In
its resolution A/61/L.67 of September 12, 2007, the United Nation General
Assembly adopted what it named THE DECLARATION ON THE RIGTHS OF INDIGEROUS
PEOPLES, which clearly outlines how indigenous communities and ethnic
nationalities can peaceably pursue their struggle for self determination.
Articles
3 of the United Nations declaration say, and I quote: “Indigenous peoples have
the right to self-determination and by virtue of that right they can freely
determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and
cultural development”.
Article
4 of the Declaration says, and I quote: “Indigenous peoples, in exercising
their rights to self-determination, have the rights to autonomy or self
government in matters relating to their internal and local affairs, as well as
ways and means for financing their autonomous functions”.
And Article 9 of the
Declaration says “Indigenous people and individuals have the rights to belong
to an indigenous community in accordance with the traditions and customs of the
community or nation concerned. No discrimination of any kind may arise from the
exercise of such a right”.
On
behalf of true nationalities in Nigeria, I declare that the colonialist who
enslaved us created Nigeria in any way that suited them. I say today that we
believe in a new age. It is now time for the different nations of Nigeria to
create the kind of togetherness their peoples may want.
May
the Lord Bless and Assist Us.
Alfred Ilenre is Secretary General, Ethnic
Minority and Indigenous Rights Organization of Africa (EMIROAF).

No comments:
Post a Comment