By Chido
Onumah
No topic has
generated as much interest in the ongoing bogus constitution amendment process as
the issue of local government autonomy. That we have embarked on wholesale amendment
14 years after we were handed a constitution by the military high command is a
measure of the instability in the polity.
A constitution or the
process of constitution making is not a joke and no nation desirous of making
progress should treat it as such. In Nigeria, once you have a new majority
(military or civilian) it fancies the need for a “new” constitution. What this
tells us is that we need a constitution of “we the people” that will be the necessary
outcome of a conference based on the sovereign will of Nigerians.
Autonomy, like
independence, is a fancy word; one that everybody wants to identify with. It is
understandable, therefore, if you ask most Nigerians whether they support local
government autonomy as being canvassed in the current constitution amendment, they
would answer in the affirmative. Unfortunately, in the opinion of this tyrannical
majority whose voices appear dominant, anybody who has a contrary view is not a
democrat.
Of course, there is a
strong case to be made for local governments. Local governments are closest to
majority of Nigerians and are in a vantage position to cater to the needs of
our rural population. However, in the context of federalism, autonomy for local
governments ought to be defined by states and not the federal government.
A few weeks ago, the
governor of the State of Osun, Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola and Prof. Itse Sagay (SAN)
stirred up a hornet’s nest with their intervention on the autonomy debate. At
the second edition of the National Public Discourse, with the theme, “Local
Government Authority: How Autonomous?” they faulted the argument for local
government autonomy.
Aregbesola
made a point which should be obvious to the proponents of local government
autonomy which is that the federating units in Nigeria are the states and the
centre. “The states are federating units, while the local governments are
merely administrative units, centres of development in the states. Local
government must not be seen as anything outside the total authority of the
states,” Aregbesola said.
According
to Sagay, “Every state should create, fund and run local government as they deem
fit. Why should we even have a Federation Account? Why not Federal Government
account and state government accounts? Why can’t a state decide the structure
it wants to run for its local governments?
How can the National Assembly dream
that the Independent National Electoral Commission should start conducting
local government elections? They say it is because the state governments are
rigging the local government elections. Then I ask: Is the Federal Government
not rigging the election conducted by INEC?” These are pertinent
questions.
Both Aregbesola and Sagay have been
criticised for their position. Unfortunately, their traducers refuse to see the
bigger picture. I think the issue of local government autonomy is driven more
by hysteria than commonsense. When you ask why they support local government
autonomy, proponents point to the constitution; the same dubious constitution given
to us by the military in 1999. It is important to note that the country went
through Gen. Abacha’s transition which was completed by Gen. Abdulsalami
Abubakar without the electorate seeing this constitution.
The
constitution lists 774 local governments, effectively putting an end to
development at the local level because it is unlikely that a civilian
government can create new local governments even if the need arises. It is
absurd to legislate local governments in the constitution.
Apart from
constraining the states, it presupposes that our rural areas can’t grow beyond
their current state. A few days ago, in a conversation with a member of the
National Assembly, I raised the issue of listing local governments in the
constitution. He agreed it was an anomaly, but one that we have to live with.
Why do we have to live with this anomaly when we can change it?
Why
have we arrogated to the federal government the power to create local
governments in the states? Why have we given the federal government the power
to give money to local governments? It is this unregulated power that has
created the twisted logic that makes it possible, for example, for Kano to have
44 local governments while Lagos has 20 local governments. It is bad enough
that the constitution stipulates a system of local government administration,
it is retrogressive to dictate the number of local governments states should
have.
Clearly,
the whole talk about local government autonomy is sophisticated BS. These local
governments were not created to bring governance to the rural population but as
a means of sharing the national cake.
Moving
forward, we must make our states the centre of development. States in Nigeria
were created depending on the whims of the military regime in power. It is
unfortunate that because the military created these states, they have remained
dependent entities that go cap in hand every month to the centre for
sustenance.
States should be allowed to create the
number of local governments, local council development areas or any other name
they want to call it as it suits them. They should decide the structure of
these councils and how they would be run. They should run their law enforcement
(police), subject, of course, to the Nigeria Police in inter-state crimes and
federal offences.
It
means also that state assemblies would have to fashion out rules for election
in each state. I know our apostles of autonomy for local government would rise
in righteous indignation. They would argue that state governors can’t be
trusted to do the right thing in their states. But it is clear that because we
have lived under the military for the better part of our independence we are
willing to replace the so-called tyranny of the state with that of an
overbearing federal government. We have forgotten that we are a federal
republic.
Agreed
that some state governors have not managed their states well, but that is not a
case for granting autonomy to local governments outside the powers of the
states. Unlike the USA and Canada, for example, where the states (USA) and
provinces (Canada) were independent entities before they joined their different
unions or were bought as the case may be, our own states are the arbitrary
creation of the military and they have ever since acted as appendages of the federal
government.
Rather
than clamouring for local government autonomy, we should be talking about
“independence” for the states and how the states can contribute to the centre. Every
state in Nigeria today is viable. But because we have created a monstrosity in
Abuja that is set to consume all of us, we have denied the states control of their
resources and prevented them from taking responsibility for their own
sustenance and development.
The
issue of local government autonomy challenges our democracy and nationhood. Now
is the time to tackle it frontally. Now is the time to unbundle the federal
government. Our federalism is a fraud and its fraudulent structure feeds much of
the problems Nigerians have to contend with everyday.
If we want to create a more perfect
union, as Americans say, we should go beyond the current hysteria and think seriously
about renegotiating Nigeria.
No comments:
Post a Comment