NNPC

Submit articles, stories, requests and all enquiries to conumah@hotmail.com

Wednesday, 15 August 2012

A hackers' paradise called Nigeria



By
Chido Onumah















Two retired generals and former heads of state stirred up a hornet’s nest recently when they proffered solutions to the growing insecurity and hopelessness in the country. Coming on the heels of a war of attrition between them, there was enough reason for Nigerians to be guarded about the intervention by Olusegun Obasanjo and Ibrahim Babangida who ruled Nigeria cumulatively for 19 years.


The periods that these generals ruled (1976-79; 1985-93; and 1999-2007) were about the most glorious of the nation’s history, not in terms of development or genuine attempt to redefine the future of the country, but in terms of hope and desire on the part of Nigerians to lift up their country and make it a global contender. As it turned out, Obasanjo and Babangida made sure they were the years of the locust. Obasanjo and Babangida orchestrated perhaps the greatest despoliation of Nigeria, its wealth as well as human and material resources. 

Obasanjo and Babangida talked about the greatness of Nigeria and Nigerians, but they did everything possible to undermine the country and its people. They had the opportunity to write their names in gold as true statesmen, but they botched it. Of course, on the personal level, both Obasanjo and Babangida have received adequate response to their unwelcomed intervention so I shall not dwell on that. I shall focus on the thrust of their intervention.

“Nigeria’s existence not negotiable – OBJ, IBB” was how one newspaper headlined the intercession of the retired generals the morning after. The paper reported Obasanjo and Babangida as saying that “the worrying trend emerging from the violent attacks, bombings and mindless killings of innocent Nigerians was creating room for doubt about the end of the carnage, but that ‘the continued unity of this nation is not only priceless, but non-negotiable’”.

I wonder what our rulers really mean when they say the “unity of Nigeria is not negotiable”. If you hear this glib talk from people who actually did something to advance the unity of Nigeria, then it is understandable. It becomes worrisome when those who advance this proposition are those who have done everything possible to undermine the unity of the country. In simple terms, “negotiable” means “open to discussion; not fixed, but able to be established or changed through discussion and compromise”. Considering the current state of the nation, the social and political upheavals that go to the very core of national existence, only a masochist will deny that this is time to “negotiate” Nigeria.

A nation is usually united around a common national ethos, a set of values and principles that are abiding. Not so in Nigeria. For the ruling class in Nigeria, the only unifying factor is corruption, as one of their own, Governor Babangida Aliyu of Niger State, eloquently espoused in his speech at Chatham House, London, in June. For majority of Nigerians, the unifying factor is a life of grinding poverty and hopelessness. No country sustained by corruption and the poverty and hopelessness of its citizenry can survive for too long.

In a sense, therefore, the real threat to the unity of Nigerian has come from those who have succeeded in dividing Nigerians through their pillage and misuse of our patrimony. Our rulers know that the country is not working because of massive corruption and that we can’t sustain the current system for too long. Yet, because our elite, and in some cases ordinary Nigerians, seem satisfied with the proceeds of corruption, they are blind to the danger we are all entrapped in. While we are nibbling at the seams of the nation, we willfully assume that the country will still hold together and that things will get better. It is this same false hope that led us to the London Olympics after just three months of preparation. As I write, the London games are about to end without any medal hope for Nigeria. Anybody who understands Nigeria will not be surprised that this may yet be our worst Olympics.

Regrettably, our youth on whose shoulders the survival of this nation rests, appear to have imbibed the worst examples of the “wasted generation” before them. That is the real tragedy of our situation. Just last week, the African Centre for Media & Information Literacy held a lecture to mark the 2012 International Youth Day. It was meant as a sober occasion for our youth, the greatest resource of our nation, to reflect on their role and contribution to national development as well the responsibility of the government to the youth. Many of the so-called youth leaders that came for this event arrived with much fanfare, with retinues of aides in tow. All someone close by could mutter was: “if these people ever come close to power, they will do worse than our current crop of rulers”.

When I look at corruption in Nigeria, our dismal showing in London, the attitude of our dehumanized and traumatized youth, and the war mongering going on, it all makes sense to me. The conclusion I have arrived at is that it is necessary but not sufficient to do critiques of sectoral deficiencies of our problems as a nation. Nigeria has collapsed. It is imperative, therefore, that the systemic dysfunction in Nigeria is confronted and changed to cater to all in a truly law governed country. And the only way to do this is to “negotiate” Nigeria through a Sovereign National Conference (SNC), not just of so-called ethnic nationalities, but also of marginalized and pauperized people of Nigeria. 

Part of the reason corruption thrives so much in Nigeria is the structure of the country. Political violence is rife, states and ethnic nationalities are threatening secession, yet there are people who still insist that it is forbidden to question the status quo. Those who are really concerned about Nigeria and genuinely fear that the country will break up if it goes the route of SNC, as opposed to those who mouth “the unity of Nigeria is non-negotiable” should rest assured that it won’t happen without a very bloody war or wars. It is not exactly clear which ethnic nationality wants to embark on that futile journey. The greater prospect now is that of anarchy (as in Somalia) or the rise of fascism through what Edwin Madunagu describes as “a coalition of the most unlikely bed-follows’”.

What Nigeria needs now is a radical change that will redefine the country and create a new national ethos. It is for this reason that all those who have bled the country and brought it to its knees should be wary, not just of social media, but also the street anger of Nigerians.

This street anger must fester and yield positive results if we are to achieve a national renewal and end what a colleague has described as the hackers' paradise called Nigeria.








1 comment:

  1. Re: A
    Hackers’ Paradise called Nigeria





    By
    Anthony Ogunbor





    Dear Chido,





    With your article I have hope again,
    hope that we still have men as Nigerians. It is as if you captured my mood few
    hours before your post as I had just sent a mail to engage Ogaga as regards his
    own musings hours earlier. Your last two paragraphs capture the mood. God bless
    you.





    Ours has never been a nation, is not
    and will never be. Nigeria is an illusion. A foundation laid on mutual distrust
    , fueled by self deceit and pretence by a few power and money drunk Nigerians
    from all ethnic nationalities who will do anything to maintain the status quo,
    perfecting the use of bribes and the divide and rule tactics to quash any
    perceived organized opposition or movement. The governed have been
    completely dehumanized and incapacitated.





    Regardless of sectional interests,
    Nigerians are generally fed up. What people need is just promptings and ways of
    going about the imminent revolution or secession. Nigeria is not homogeneous
    and its peoples have completely different views and approaches to life and
    development. Not all countries have homogeneity of peoples but certainly not in
    the category of Nigeria. I lived and grew up in the South South. I have lived
    and worked in the East, West and North and outside Nigeria. The Northern
    people's psyche and mentality, anywhere you find them, home or abroad, is
    visibly contrasting and this one of the things at the kernel of the problem in
    Nigeria which people shy away from. Until 1914, there was no Nigeria. That
    amalgamation was not done with consultations. Why should the breakup be?





    What forms of disobedience do we adopt?
    How will the revolution, no matter how subtle begin? Where does it start from?
    How will it be sustained? What media will be used? … and much more.


    Furthermore, I am convinced that all
    Nigerian politicians and leaders past and present who have stolen and still
    continue to steal, keep and invest only about 30% of their investment in
    Nigeria. The other 70% are in the Americas, Europe, Saudi Arabia, South Africa
    and Egypt. If these rogues have nowhere to keep their stolen funds or invest
    them abroad, I am sure they will steal less.





    Perhaps Nigerians (especially those who
    live abroad and are privy to the locations of these investments) can begin a
    campaign to persuade all foreign governments to freeze the assets of
    politicians who obviously have no other means of income except their salary or
    those who have investments which they are unable to prove the legality of
    source of funds used to acquire such. The West benefits more from the Nigerian
    tragedy than any less critical thinking mind will ever imagine. A strong
    campaign against this seeming connivance will put some pressure on all parties
    to the endless rape of Nigerians.





    If Abacha’s loot were only $10,000,000
    kept in Swiss Bank since 1997 at 5% interest rate (which is too low to anywhere
    in the world), then by 2012, the accrued interest will be $7,397,260 which is
    over a billion Naira – N1,153,972,603 (if we convert at a rate N156 : $1). This
    is what Nigeria losses and Switzerland gains. It is apart from the initial
    “Capital” of $10,000,000 which will be available for the Swiss economy to lend
    to its citizens or other economic activities.





    You were right, it might be difficult
    to have over 180million people of divergent interests arising from divergent
    ethnic nationalities come together and chase out these leaders, but I tell you,
    if the South South and South East Governors ever have the courage to have a
    closed door meeting anywhere in Nigeria under any kind of name, to discuss the
    way forward, Nigeria will never be the same again. Politicians will quickly
    adjust their steps and the tune will be different. This I am sure of. Perhaps
    this is the unlikely alliance you wrote about.





    Have a great day.

    ReplyDelete

UA-39371123-1